Free-Writing
Prospectus
Filed
pursuant to Rule 433
Registration
Statement No. 333-130051
|
JPMORGAN
|
|
structured
investments
|
Building
a Case for Structured
Investments
| BUILDING
A CASE FOR STRUCTURED
INVESTMENTS |
Introduction
Investment
advisors today face a variety
of challenges when it comes to building and managing portfolios for their
clients. Each investor has individualized goals and needs. Each investor
has a unique view
of what the optimal mix of risk and reward should be. Each investor needs to
balance the desire for growth against the need to control or reduce the risk
of
losses.
In
recent years, the arsenal of
investment tools advisors
have had at their disposal has grown beyond the traditional mix of stocks,
bonds, and cash equivalent investments. Alternative investments, including
hedge
funds and private equity, have become increasingly popular among wealthy
investors. The number
and variety of ETFs has exploded.
Real estate investment trusts (REITs) have become a mainstream investment
choice. And, over the past several years, Structured Investments have become
part of the mix.
Structured
Investments have long been
popular in Europe and Asia,
and over the past several years, they have started to gain acceptance among
U.S.
investors. According to the Structured Products Association, nearly $64 billion
in new products were issued in 2006, up from $48 billion in 2005.1
Nearly half of the products
launched in 2006 were intended for the retail investor. Despite this impressive
growth rate, the prevalence of Structured Investments within U.S.
investors’
portfolios remains relatively low.
Consider that in Europe and Asia, it is not uncommon
for investors to allocate up to 30%
of their portfolios to Structured Investments.
What’s
holding back broader acceptance of
Structured Investments? The primary roadblock seems to be awareness and
education. U.S. investors simply are not familiar with the majority of these
investments. In
fact, according to a 2007 report from Spectrem Group, a Chicago-based strategic
consulting firm specializing in the affluent and retirement markets, only 15%
of
affluent investors understand Structured
Investments.2
This
report examines the role that
Structured Investments can play in a diversified portfolio and how they can
help
meet a variety of objectives, including risk reduction. This report defines
the
most common types of Structured Investments available today and
discusses the benefits and risks of
each type of investment, along with practical applications on how they can
be
incorporated into actual portfolio allocations across multiple asset classes.
The goal is to build greater awareness of Structured Investments
by educating registered
representatives and investment advisors, as well as their clients, about the
potential benefits of a strategic allocation to these
products.
1
www.structuredproducts.org.
2“Structured
Products on the
Rise,” Investment
Advisor.com, June 1, 2007.
The
discussion contained in the
following pages is for educational and illustrative purposes only. The
preliminary and final terms of any securities offered by JPMorgan Chase &
Co. will be different
from
those set forth in general terms in this report and any such final terms
will
depend on, among other things, market conditions on the applicable launch
and
pricing dates for such securities. Any information relating to
performances contained
in these materials is
illustrative and no assurance is given that any indicated returns, performance
or results, whether historical or hypothetical, will be achieved. The
information in this report is subject to change, and JPMorgan undertakes
no
duty to update these materials or to
supply corrections. This material shall be amended, superseded and replaced
in
its entirety by a subsequent preliminary or final term sheet and/or pricing
supplement, and the documents referred to therein, which will be
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or SEC. In the event of any inconsistency between the materials
presented in the following pages and any such prelimi¬nary or final term
sheet or pricing
supplement, such preliminary or final term sheet or
pricing supplement shall
govern.
IRS
Circular 230 Disclosure: JPMorgan
Chase & Co. and its affiliates do not provide tax advice. Accordingly, any
discussion of U.S. tax matters contained herein (including any appendix)
is not
intended or written to be used, and cannot be
used, in connection
with the promotion, marketing or recommendation by anyone unaffiliated with
JPMorgan Chase & Co. of any of the matters addressed herein or for the
purpose of avoiding U.S. tax-related penalties.
Demystifying
Structured
Investments
All
Structured Investments are designed to meet specific investment objectives,
whether it is principal protection or enhanced returns (alpha). They also
provide individual investors with an opportunity to access a diverse array
of
asset classes, such as commodities and foreign currencies, which in the past
were primarily available to institutional investors.
Rather
than viewing
Structured Investments as a separate and distinct asset class, many investment
advisors treat them as a subcategory within each of the primary asset classes.
For example, equity-linked Structured Investments can be viewed as part of
a
client’s allocation to equities. Investment advisors and their clients can use
Structured Investments to achieve greater diversification, to gain or hedge
exposure to certain asset classes, or to align portfolios with a particular
market or economic view.
One
of the unique characteristics of Structured Investments is that they provide
asymmetrical returns, with performance that is higher or lower than returns
derived from a direct investment in a particular asset class. This non-linear
performance profile helps clients plan for specific financial milestones, such
as paying for retirement or college. For example, a Principal Protected
Investment can provide clients who are planning for retirement with additional
equity exposure, along with full downside protection. With today’s retirees
enjoying longer lives than past generations, such protection is more important
than ever.
Structured
Investments usually combine a debt security with exposure to an underlying
asset, such as equities, foreign currencies, commodities, or a basket of
different indices. In this regard, they are considered to be derivative
investments. To many investors, the word “derivative” is synonymous with
“risky.” Recent fluctuations in the credit markets due to the subprime mortgage
meltdown have done little to alleviate investors’ fear of derivatives. In
practice, however, certain Structured Investments are often used as a means
of
reducing risk by incorporating principal protection while providing the
potential to outperform in range-bound markets.
Generally,
Structured Investments can help investors achieve three primary objectives:
investment returns with little or no principal at risk, higher returns in a
range-bound market with or without some principal protection, and alternatives
for generating higher yields in investors’ portfolios.
| BUILDING
A CASE FOR STRUCTURED
INVESTMENTS |
Investment
Returns without
Principal
Risk:
Principal
Protected Investments
(PPIs)
Principal
Protected
Investments combine some of the features of a fixed-income security, such as
return of principal at maturity, with the potential for capital appreciation
that can be derived from different types of securities, including equities.
They
are designed to protect against losses at maturity, while providing the
opportunity to participate in the gains on an equity investment. Depending
on
the specific offering, PPIs may offer full upside participation or they may
be
subject to a maximum return. In all cases, clients forgo dividends.
PPIs
typically
mature within one to seven years, and clients must hold them until maturity
to
guarantee their principal’s return. Maturities shorter than five years typically
have a cap or maximum return. Generally, they are issued as registered notes
or
certificates of deposit in $1,000 denominations. PPIs can be linked to a variety
of underlying assets, including an equity index, a basket of equities,
commodities, or currencies. Many investors hold PPIs in tax-deferred accounts.
This report focuses on PPIs linked to an equity index.
Anatomy
of a
PPI
When
constructing a
PPI that is linked to an equity index, the issuers invest in both zero coupon
bonds and equity call options (see figure 1). First, they use a portion of
the
available assets to structure zero coupon bonds that match the maturity date
and
principal amount of the PPI. Unlike regular bonds, zero coupon bonds are issued
at a discount to their face value and do not pay interest. This means that
issuers can structure a bond that will return $1,000 at maturity for an upfront
investment of less than $1,000. The difference between the bond’s value at
maturity and the amount paid represents the bond’s implied return.
By
investing in zero coupon bonds, the issuers are seeking to ensure that the
PPI’s
investment principal will be protected at maturity. The investor’s direct credit
risk is limited to the financial well being of the issuer (in this case,
JPMorgan).
Because
zero coupon
bonds are issued at a discount to their face value, the PPI issuers will have
excess capital to invest. They put this money to work by structuring equity
call
options on a broad-based equity index, such as the S&P 500™ Index. A call
option gives an investor the right (but not the obligation) to buy an investment
in the index at a specified price within a specific period of time. The call
options typically have an expiration date that matches the maturity date of
the
zero coupon bond, along with a “strike price,” or entry point, that matches the
current value of the index. If the underlying asset (the S&P 500 Index)
increases in value, the value of the call option will also
increase.
No
Free
Lunch
As
mentioned above, PPIs allow clients to participate in some — but typically not
all — of the gains in an equity index via a call option. To pay for the
principal protection provided by the investment in zero coupon bonds, however,
investors forfeit all dividend income, and may also forgo a portion of any
gains
in the equity index. The percentage of the potential gains that investors
receive — known as the “participation rate”— will vary for each PPI, depending
on the underlying asset, the maturity date, and the minimum and maximum return
payouts.
The
participation rate is determined by two factors: the remaining capital available
after structuring the zero coupon bond and the price of the equity call option.
The price paid for the equity call option depends upon the implied volatility
of
the equity index purchased.
Generally,
higher
market volatility leads to higher prices for index call options. There is no
way
to control this; therefore, the participation rate will be determined by market
conditions at the time of issuance. When volatility is lower, participation
rates are higher, and vice versa.
PPI
Performance under Different Market
Conditions
To
illustrate how a PPI might perform under varying market conditions, refer to
figure 2. In this hypothetical example, your client, John, invests $1,000 in
a
Principal Protected Investment linked to the S&P 500 Index. The PPI matures
in seven years and offers a participation rate of 90%. This means that, should
the S&P 500 move higher, John would participate in 90% of those
gains.
If,
at the PPI’s maturity, the S&P 500 had risen 20%, John would receive his
original investment ($1,000), plus a return of 18% ($1,000 x 90% (0.90) x 20%
(0.20) = $180). While the PPI gained less than a direct investment in the index
would have returned ($200 plus the dividend yield), John can take comfort in
the
fact that his principal investment was safe throughout the seven-year term
of
his PPI.
Now
consider what happens if the S&P 500 were to decline 20% at maturity (figure
2). Rather than incurring a $200 loss, John would receive his entire principal
back. As this example demonstrates, PPIs will always outperform a direct
investment in an index during periods of market declines and may underperform
during periods of market gains.
Are
PPIs Right for Your
Clients?
If
you have clients who are saving and investing for life’s major milestones, who
tend to avoid equities altogether, or who often make risky bets in an effort
to
break even on stocks that have lost value, PPIs may be a suitable investment
for
them. Do you recognize any of your clients in the following
profiles?
Focused
on
Life’s Milestones. People who are investing for a specific long-term
goal, such as future college expenses, retirement, or a vacation home, usually
have a good idea of the minimum amount they will need to meet their objective.
For these investors, returns over and above their goal are “nice to have,” but
not a necessity. On the other hand, they cannot tolerate the idea of failing
to
meet their goal, and thus they often favor fixed-income or cash investments
over
more volatile equities. Because returns from fixed-income investments have
historically lagged those of equities, however, these investors may have to
save
a much higher proportion of their income to meet their goal.

Nervous
Nellies. All investments entail a tradeoff between risk and reward.
Investors typically will take on more risk when they are convinced that the
potential for higher returns outweighs the risk of losses. Some investors,
however, have such a high degree of loss-aversion that they have difficulty
taking on a rational amount of market risk.
According
to the
“prospect theory” of behavioral finance researchers, these investors evaluate
gains and losses in an entirely different manner, attributing more importance
to
investment losses than investment gains. Whereas these investors are happy
when
they gain $100, they are not twice as happy when they gain $200. Conversely,
they consider a $100 loss more important than a $100 gain. This tendency to
avoid any losses relegates their portfolio to fixed-income and cash investments.
While these clients may never find equities attractive, PPIs allow them to
participate in potential equity market gains while protecting their
principal.
| BUILDING
A CASE FOR STRUCTURED INVESTMENTS |
Those
Who
Cannot Let Go. On the other end of the risk spectrum, some investors
have such a high degree of confidence in their investment decisions that they
have difficulty letting go of poorly performing stocks. When a stock holding
declines, they tend to take increasingly risky bets in an effort to break even.
Research has shown that investors tend to hold on to their poorly performing
stocks even when it’s clear that they should have reallocated a portion of their
funds to safer investments, such as fixed income or cash. For clients who fit
this profile, PPIs offer an effective way to avoid reckless behavior without
sacrificing the potential for equity returns.
|
Certain
Risk
Considerations
Principal
Protected Investments
Market
Risk. Returns on equity linked PPIs at maturity are generally
linked to the performance of an underlying asset such as an index,
and
will depend on whether, and the extent to which, the applicable index
appreciates during the term of the notes. You will receive no more
than
the full principal amount of your notes at maturity if the applicable
index is flat or negative during the term of any applicable JPMorgan
equity linked PPIs. In some cases, returns on the notes may be limited
to
a maximum return.
JPMorgan
equity linked PPIs might not pay more than the principal amount.
You may receive a lower payment at maturity than you would have received
if you had invested in the index, the stocks composing the index,
or
contracts related to the index. If the level of the index declines
at the
end of the term of the notes, as compared to the beginning of the
term of
the notes, your gain on the notes may be zero.
|
Principal
Protected Investments
(PPIs)
What
benefits do PPIs provide?
Generally,
Principal
Protected Investments offer a return at maturity that is linked to an underlying
asset, such as a broad market index or a basket of stocks. They provide some
of
the features of a fixed-income security, such as return of principal at
maturity, along with the potential for capital appreciation that equities
provide. Maturities range from one to seven years, and investors should plan
to
hold them to maturity.
What’s
the
downside?
Investors
forgo
dividends and interest, and may also give up a portion of any capital
appreciation in exchange for principal protection.
PPIs
may be
right for clients who:
|
·
|
Have
a medium
to long-term horizon (one to seven years) and are saving to meet
specific
financial goals, such as retirement or
college.
|
|
·
|
Are
loss-averse investors who typically avoid equities
altogether.
|
|
·
|
Tend
to make
increasingly aggressive bets in an effort to break even on poorly
performing stocks.
|
|
·
|
Do
not have an
overly bullish outlook for the stock
market.
|
Additional
Asset Class Exposure
along
with Partial Downside
Protection:
Buffered
Return Enhanced
Notes
(BRENs)
Building
a truly
diversified portfolio means investing in a wide variety of assets, such as
stocks, bonds, and commodities. Clients should also look to further diversify
by
investing in different types of securities within each major asset class. For
example, clients might divide their equity portfolio allocation among small-
and
large-cap stocks, international stocks, and emerging markets.
Investors
who have
difficulty maintaining exposure to volatile asset classes may be reluctant
to
invest in certain assets. For these investors, a relatively new type of
structured
investment, known as a Buffered Return Enhanced Note (BREN), can reduce the
risks of investing in certain volatile asset classes by providing partial
downside protection.
The
specific terms and conditions of each BREN vary, but they are typically linked
to the performance of a particular market index, such as the S&P 500 Index
or the Dow Jones AIG Commodity Index. They are issued as senior unsecured debt
obligations, mature within one to five years, and generally trade in $1,000
increments. BRENs typically use leverage to pay investors as much as 150% of
the
return of their benchmark index. Unlike a direct investment in an index,
however, investors forgo any dividend or interest income. In some cases, a
BREN
may be subject to a cap on gains. Depending on the BREN’s specific economics, it
may be treated as an open transaction. Any gains earned on a BREN may be taxed
as long-term capital gains as long as the investment is held unhedged for more
than one year. An investor who is considering acquiring a BREN in a taxable
account must consult his own tax advisor and refer to the tax disclosure in
the
prospectus. Therefore, they may be more suitable for taxable accounts than
PPIs.
In
addition to allowing individual investors to access asset classes that in the
past were primarily available to institutional investors, BRENs feature a
“buffer” that provides partial principal protection. These buffers typically
range from 10% to 15%. A BREN with a 10% buffer, for example, will return a
client’s entire principal if the index has declined by 10% or less at maturity.
However, if index losses exceed 10%, clients begin to lose principal. Clients
who are comfortable taking on some downside risk, but prefer a buffer to cushion
against more severe losses, may want to consider a BREN.
BREN
Performance under
Different Market
Conditions
To
understand how a BREN might perform under varying market conditions, consider
this hypothetical example. Pauline invests $1,000 in a BREN linked to a basket
of global equities that matures in three years. The basket composition is
one-third the S&P 500 Index, one-third the Nikkei 225 Index, and one-third
the Dow Jones Euro Stoxx 50 Index. The BREN pays 1.35 times the upside of the
basket at maturity and offers a 10% buffer. This means that Pauline will
experience principal losses only if the indices decline by more than 10% at
maturity. She also enjoys uncapped leveraged participation in the basket if
she
holds it to maturity.
Figure
3
demonstrates what would happen if the indices closed 8% higher at maturity.
In
this case, Pauline would enjoy a total return of 10.8%—1.35 times that of a
direct investment in the indices. If the indices declined 10% or less at
maturity, Pauline would receive her $1,000 principal back. As this example
demonstrates, BRENs may outperform a direct investment in a basket of indices
whenever the basket declines in value during the term of the note.
What
happens if the
basket experiences a more pronounced decline? If, for example, the basket closed
down
| BUILDING
A CASE FOR STRUCTURED
INVESTMENTS |
20%
at maturity, Pauline would lose 10% of her principal. This would result in
a
loss of $100, which would be preferable to the $200 loss that a direct
investment in the basket would have yielded.
|
Certain
Risk
Considerations
Buffered
Return Enhanced Notes (BRENs)
Your
investment may result in a loss. BRENs do not guarantee any
return of principal in excess of the buffer amount and, in some
structures, may not return any principal at all. The return on
the BREN at
maturity is linked to the performance of the applicable underlying
index
and will depend on whether and the extent to which the underlying
index
return is positive or negative during the term of the BREN. If
the BREN
has a 1:1 downside leverage factor beyond the buffer, your investment
will
be exposed to any decline in the level of the index, as compared
to its
starting level, beyond the buffer amount.
In
some cases, your maximum gain on a BREN may be limited with a maximum
total return. For each BREN with a maximum return, if the
applicable index return is positive, you will receive at maturity
your
principal plus an additional amount that will not exceed a predetermined
percentage of the principal amount, regardless of the index appreciation,
which may be significantly different from the performance of the
underlying.
|
Buffered
Return Enhanced Notes
(BRENs)
What
benefits do they provide?
BRENs
allow clients
to invest in more volatile and sometimes hard-to-access asset classes. They
provide leveraged returns along with partial principal protection. Maturities
range from one to five years, depending on the BREN’s specific economics, and
the BREN may be treated as an open transaction. Investors may receive long-term
capital gains tax treatment if held unhedged more than one year.
What’s
the
downside?
In
order to provide leveraged returns, some BRENs (typically those with 200% to
300% leverage) usually include a cap on the maximum return. If the market index
rises dramatically, clients will forgo gains beyond the cap. If the market
were
to decline dramatically, the majority of a client’s capital would be at
risk.
BRENs
may be
right for clients who:
|
·
|
Are
looking to
diversify their taxable portfolios by gaining exposure to additional
asset
classes.
|
|
·
|
Are
comfortable with some downside risk, but want partial principal
protection.
|
|
·
|
Are
looking to
generate returns beyond those available in moderately rising or
range-bound markets.
|
Higher
Returns
in a Range-Bound
Market:
Return-Enhanced
Notes (RENs)
In
three out of the four years from 2003 to 2006, stocks, as measured by the total
return of the S&P 500 Index, logged double-digit gains. During such periods
of relative economic strength, investing in stocks can be particularly
rewarding. But what happens when the outlook for the economy and stocks becomes
less certain? That’s when stocks often move in a sideways direction, with no
meaningful moves to the upside or to the downside. Under these conditions,
investors have been limited to middling returns from their stock portfolios.
By
investing in a Return Enhanced Note (REN), however, clients may be able to
earn
higher returns during range-bound markets.
At
any time, investors will have differing views on the market’s future direction.
Some investors may be highly optimistic while others are pessimistic. For
clients who believe that market returns will likely be only moderately higher
over a period of one to three years, a REN can help them monetize this view.
By
purchasing a REN, clients effectively forfeit the right to participate in major
market rallies that they consider unlikely to occur. In exchange, a REN provides
leveraged returns that enable them to earn higher profits when the market
experiences only moderate gains.
Just
as with BRENs,
the specific terms and conditions of each REN will vary. They are typically
linked to the performance of a broad-based equity index, such as the S&P 500
or the Nasdaq-100, and most pay double or triple
the
return of their benchmark index. RENs are issued as senior unsecured debt
obligations that mature within one to three years and generally trade in $1,000
increments. Unlike a direct investment, however, the upside performance
potential on a REN is usually subject to a cap. In addition, unlike BRENs,
RENs
provide no protection against market declines. To better understand how RENs
work, consider the following hypothetical example.
REN
Performance under Different Market
Conditions
Paul
believes the
Nasdaq-100 Index is unlikely to gain more than 5% in each of the next two years.
He would like the potential to earn more than 10%, so Paul purchases a two-year
REN that pays twice the return of the Nasdaq-100 at maturity, up to a 24%
maximum return. If Paul’s outlook is correct and the Nasdaq-100 gains 10% at
maturity, his total return would be double that of the index, or 20% (figure
4).
Under this scenario, Paul’s moderately bullish market view enables him to
leverage below average market returns and earn a healthy profit.
What
happens if
Paul’s outlook is wrong and the Nasdaq-100 rallies 40% over the course of two
years? In that case, Paul’s gain is capped at 24%. That’s because he “sold away”
his right to earn market-matching returns in exchange for leveraged returns
when
the market rose only moderately. In this example, Paul’s REN would outperform a
direct investment in the Nasdaq-100 (excluding dividends) as long as the index
returns less than the cap or maximum return.
Return
Enhanced Notes
(RENs)
What
benefits do they provide?
RENs
enable
investors with a moderately bullish view of the market to potentially outperform
a market index through leveraged returns. Maturities range from one to three
years.
What’s
the
downside?
Gains
may be capped,
so if the market index rises dramatically, clients forgo gains beyond the cap.
RENs provide no principal protection in the event of a market decline. As with
all Structured Investments, clients forgo the dividend income from the
underlying asset.
RENs
may be
right for clients who:
|
·
|
Are
looking to
diversify their taxable portfolios.
|
|
·
|
Are
seeking
returns beyond those available in moderately rising or range-bound
markets.
|
|
·
|
Are
comfortable taking on full downside
risk.
|
Clients
should also
consider what happens when the REN’s benchmark index declines. RENs do not
provide any downside protection, so if the Nasdaq-100 had declined 10% at
maturity, Paul would have lost 10% on his REN. This loss matches what he would
have experienced through a direct investment in the Nasdaq-100.
|
Certain
Risk
Considerations
Return
Enhanced Notes (RENs).
Your
investment may result in a loss. RENs do not guarantee any return
of principal. Returns on RENs at maturity are linked to the performance
of
the applicable underlying index and will depend on whether and
the extent
to which the underlying index return is positive or negative during
the
term of the REN.
In
some cases, your maximum gain on a REN is limited to a maximum
total
return. For each REN with a maximum return, if the applicable
index return is positive, you will receive at maturity your principal
plus
an additional amount that will not exceed a predetermined percentage
of
the principal amount, regardless of the index appreciation, which
may be
significantly different from the performance of the
underlying.
|
| BUILDING
A CASE FOR STRUCTURED
INVESTMENTS |
Solutions
for Generating
Higher
Yields in Client
Portfolios:
Reverse
Exchangeables
Investors
who
believe that returns for stocks or bonds are likely to be range-bound over
the
short term may want to consider a Reverse Exchangeable to monetize this view.
A
Reverse Exchangeable enables clients to earn potentially higher yields in a
low-return environment, along with contingent principal protection.
Anatomy
of a Reverse
Exchangeable
A
Reverse Exchangeable is a hybrid security that pays a fixed coupon and provides
contingent protection for an investor’s investment principal. The specific terms
and conditions of every Reverse Exchangeable vary, but they are typically linked
to the performance of a single stock, a basket of stocks, or a stock market
index. They are issued as registered notes, mature within one year or less,
and
trade in $1,000 increments. The coupon from a Reverse Exchangeable is taxed
partially as interest on deposit and as put premium.
The
primary appeal of a Reverse Exchangeable is its coupon, which typically ranges
between 10% and 20% per annum. Under most conditions, this yield is higher
than
what clients might attain from a traditional bond or money market investment.
Unlike a direct investment in a stock or bond, however, a client’s upside
potential on a Reverse Exchangeable is limited to the coupon amount. If the
underlying asset appreciates in value, investors do not participate in those
gains. Therefore, Reverse Exchangeables may be appropriate for clients who
believe that the return on the underlying security will be lower than the coupon
rate they can earn over the short term (one year or less).
The
coupon on a Reverse Exchangeable is determined by the volatility of the
underlying stock or basket of stocks, as well as the amount of contingent
protection incorporated. The dividend yield of the underlying stock will also
factor into the coupon rate — the higher the dividend, the higher the coupon
rate. Once determined, the coupon rate remains fixed regardless of how the
underlying asset performs. The frequency of interest payments varies and can
occur periodically throughout the term of the note or can offer payment in
full
at maturity. In all cases, the frequency of interest payments is determined
and
disclosed at inception.
In
addition to providing high coupon rates, Reverse Exchangeables feature a
“contingent buffer.” This contingent buffer, which typically ranges between 20%
and 30%, protects principal in the event of a moderate decrease in the value
of
the underlying security.
Unlike
the buffer in
a BREN, the contingent buffer disappears or gets “knocked out” if the security
closes below the buffer level at any time during the life of the note. If that
occurs, and the stock does not close above its initial level on the final
observation date, clients may receive physical settlement at maturity, that
is,
actual shares of the underlying security, (assuming the underlying asset is
a
single stock) or the cash value of the actual shares. Reverse Exchangeables
linked to a commodity, fixed-income instrument, or index offer cash settlement
under these circumstances. Clients should be comfortable with the prospect
of
holding shares of the underlying asset before investing in a Reverse
Exchangeable.
Reverse
Exchangeable Performance
under Different Market
Conditions
To
understand how a Reverse Exchangeable might perform under varying market
conditions, consider the following hypothetical example. David invests $1,000
in
a Reverse Exchangeable linked to ABC stock. The Reverse Exchangeable pays a
coupon rate of 20% and features a 20% contingent buffer. ABC stock is trading
at
$10 a share.
There
are several
possible outcomes that can occur when a Reverse Exchangeable matures. If the
underlying stock never falls below the level of its contingent buffer ($8),
David receives 100% of his principal back, along with any
accrued
interest due
(see figure 5). For example, if the lowest closing price of ABC stock was $9.50,
David would receive his entire principal back ($1,000), along with 20% interest
($200). Because the stock never breached the 20% contingent buffer by falling
below $8 a share, David’s principal remained protected. The outcome would be the
same if ABC stock breached the buffer, falling below $8, but then closed above
the initial level of $10 a share on the final observation date.
|
Certain
Risk
Considerations
Reverse
Exchangeables
An
investment in Reverse Exchangeables may result in a loss. The
notes do not guarantee any return of principal. Under certain
circumstances, you will receive at maturity a predetermined number
of
shares of the applicable underlying stock. The market value of
those
shares will most likely be less than the principal amount invested
and may
be zero.
Your
return on a Reverse Exchangeable is limited to the principal
amount plus
accrued interest. For each $1,000 principal amount note, your
maximum return at maturity is $1,000 plus any accrued and unpaid
interest,
regardless of any appreciation in the value of the applicable
underlying
stock, which may be significant. Accordingly, the return on a
Reverse
Exchangeable may be significantly less than the return on a direct
investment in the applicable underlying stock.
Your
contingent buffer may terminate on any day during the term of
the Reverse
Exchangeable. If on any day during the term of the notes the
closing price of the underlying stock declines below the contingent
buffer, you will be fully exposed at maturity to any depreciation
in that
reference stock. You will be subject to this potential loss of
principal
unless at maturity the price of the applicable underlying stock
subsequently recovers to an amount in excess of its initial level
on the
pricing date.
|
Now
consider what
would have happened if ABC stock fell below $8 and remained there on the
final
observation date (see figure 6). In this case, David would receive physical
delivery of 100 shares of ABC stock at maturity, or its equivalent in cash,
along with any accrued interest. The number of shares he receives is determined
by dividing the stock price at inception by the initial investment. For example,
if ABC stock was trading at $10 at inception and David invested $1,000, he
would
receive 100 shares at maturity. If the Reverse Exchangeable settled in cash,
the
cash payment would reflect the decrease in the price of the underlying on
the
final observation date. While the overall value of ABC stock fell, the high
coupon rate that David received helped to offset the decline in the value
of his
stock.
Due
to its coupon rate and contingent buffer, a Reverse Exchangeable will always
outperform its underlying asset in a bear market. However, the maximum return
is
the coupon rate. Therefore, investors must be willing to forgo any appreciation
in the value of the underlying security in exchange for the coupon rate. Clients
who have a neutral to moderately bullish short-term outlook, are seeking a
coupon rate that is higher than current yields, and are comfortable taking
on
some downside risk, may want to consider a Reverse Exchangeable.
Reverse
Exchangeables
What
benefits do they provide?
Reverse
Exchangeables provide attractive coupon rates and contingent protection. They
will always outperform the underlying security in a bear market, due to the
coupon rates they pay. They typically mature in one year or less.
What’s
the
downside?
If
the underlying asset appreciates in value, investors do not participate in
those
gains. The notes provide only contingent principal protection and that
protection disappears, or “knocks-out,” if the underlying security closes below
the predetermined contingent buffer level. Investors may receive physical shares
at maturity or equivalent cash value.
Reverse
Exchangeables may be right for clients who:
|
·
|
Have
a
range-bound view of the markets.
|
|
·
|
Are
income-oriented investors.
|
|
·
|
Are
comfortable taking on some downside
risk.
|
| BUILDING
A CASE FOR STRUCTURED
INVESTMENTS |
Practical
Applications
Advisors
commonly
look for two types of returns: alpha and beta. Many advisors add active equity
managers for the alpha portion of clients’ returns. They also turn to ETFs for
the beta portion of their invested returns, hoping to simply mirror major index
returns. We would like to introduce a third type of return: structural alpha.
What follows is an explanation of how Structured Investments can add structural
returns to client portfolios.
These
examples are
based on actual investments used by advisors in their approach to reducing
risk
while seeking to generate excess market returns. Note that most advisors do
not
view Structured Investments as their own asset class. Instead, they view
Structured Investments as an overlay to an existing portfolio allocation. For
example, if a client has a 40% allocation to equities, in many cases advisors
will carve out a portion of the equity allocation to be used for a structured
investment to add some downside protection and leverage. Below is an example
of
such an allocation.
S&P
500
With
the spike in
volatility in the summer of 2007, we saw considerable interest from advisors
in
taking a short-term view on the S&P 500. One particular investment that
garnered interest was a Buffered Return Enhanced Note with an 18-month maturity,
two-times upside participation, a maximum return of 19%, and a buffer of
10%.
The
note offered a relatively short-dated maturity, some protection against further
market declines, as well as a way to outperform in a low-return environment.
Many advisors have used assets slotted for the equity portion of their clients’
portfolios to fund this type of investment.
International
and Emerging
Markets
Over
the past year,
advisors and clients have been searching for a means to add exposure to
international equities, including emerging markets, without taking on an equal
amount of risk. One particular client ultimately settled on a BREN with a 75%
allocation to global equities, including the S&P 500 Index, the Dow Jones
Euro Stoxx 50 Index, and the Nikkei 225 Index. The remaining 25% allocation
was
dedicated to emerging markets, including the S&P BRIC Index (Brazil, Russia,
India, and China) and the CECEEUR (Eastern Europe Index).
The
BREN offered a three-year maturity with a 15% buffer, and 130% uncapped exposure
to any appreciation of the equity basket. The funds for the investment came
from
the client’s allocation to international investments, as well as emerging
markets. Although the investment had a 25% exposure to emerging markets, the
overall equity portfolio allocation was much smaller.
Commodities
Commodity
exposure
can be particularly challenging for investment advisors, as clients are often
concerned about the potential volatility of commodities. There are many ways
to
access commodities, including but not limited to, single commodity exposure,
multiple commodity exposure, and index exposure. In addition, advisors can
elect
to add no downside protection, some downside protection, or full downside
protection.
Some
advisors and
their clients have invested in a Principal Protected Investment that offers
exposure to a basket of commodities. The Basket itself comprises Oil (35%),
Aluminum (15%), Copper (15%), S&P GSCI Precious Metals Index (15%), S&P
GSCI Agriculture Index (10%), and finally S&P GSCI Livestock Index (10%).
This PPI offered 140% uncapped exposure to this basket of commodities, full
principal protection at maturity, as well as 40% participation in any
depreciation of the basket. The unusual feature in this particular investment
was the ability to have a positive return in a down market as well.
Advisors
who
purchase this type of investment for their clients may be pulling assets from
their clients’ commodity allocation and may elect to continue to allocate the
remaining commodity allocation to traditional commodity investments, such as
ETFs or mutual funds. In some cases, advisors may be making an initial
allocation to commodities as an asset class, while in other cases they are
redefining portfolio risk to the downside.
Do
Structured Investments Make Sense for
Your Clients?
Structured
Investments can provide innovative ways to help meet a variety of risk/return
profiles. Whether clients are looking for principal protection, additional
asset
exposure, enhanced returns, or a combination of the two, a structured investment
exists (or can be created) to meet each client’s unique needs.
To
determine whether these investments are an appropriate match for clients,
consider the following questions:
|
·
|
What
is the
client’s investment time horizon?
|
|
·
|
How
much risk
is the client comfortable taking
on?
|
|
·
|
Is
the client
willing to sacrifice higher returns in exchange for principal
protection?
|
|
·
|
Is
the client
more concerned with meeting specific goals than with achieving more
alpha?
|
|
·
|
Does
the
client have specific income needs?
|
|
·
|
Does
the
client have a bullish, bearish, or neutral market
outlook?
|
|
·
|
Can
the client
do without a regular stream of
income?
|
|
·
|
Is
the client
able to invest capital for long periods of time, up to seven
years?
|
The
answers to these questions should help you ascertain whether Structured
Investments belong in your clients’ portfolios. At a minimum, taking the time to
gain a better understanding of clients’ financial goals and risk tolerance can
be its own reward, as it may lead to deeper, more productive client
relationships.
| BUILDING
A CASE FOR STRUCTURED
INVESTMENTS |
Frequently
Asked Questions
Where
do
Structured Investments fit within clients’ overall asset
allocation?
Investment
advisors
often consider Structured Investments as a component of their clients’
alternative investment allocation or as an allocation to the underlying asset
class. Within this subset, advisors can access tools to achieve structural
alpha
within their existing allocations to traditional asset classes. Structured
Investments can be used to redefine risk, enhance yield, or monetize a
particular market view.
Can
Structured Investments be sold in the secondary
market?
Structured
Investments are intended to be held to maturity. However, in cases where
investors need access to their capital, JPMorgan intends to support a liquid
secondary market for all Structured Investments the company issues. Fees and
commissions may impact the prices of the investments and the terms are only
guaranteed at maturity. Real-time bids are published on Bloomberg or can be
attained by calling JPMorgan at 1-800-576-3529.
Do
Structured Investments appear on client statements?
JPMorgan’s
relationship with leading custodians enables most advisors to value Structured
Investments on consolidated statements. We also provide daily valuations for
advisors who self-custody.
How
often do you launch new products?
Each
month, JPMorgan
offers a new portfolio of Structured Investments designed to meet a variety
of
risk/return profiles. The minimum purchase amount is $1,000 and subsequent
purchases are also in $1,000 increments. We deliver Structured Investments
to
advisors’ custodians upon settlement. Settlement is determined when the note is
issued and typically occurs within three days of the actual trade
date.
Does
JPMorgan offer customized solutions?
We
can tailor products to monetize a particular market view or client need, subject
to certain investment minimums.
Can
I
create my own Structured Investments for my clients?
While
in some cases
it may be possible to replicate a structured investment on your own, the costs
and complexities of doing so will most likely outweigh the convenience of a
professionally engineered structured investment.
Where
can I get more information about JPMorgan Structured
Investments?
Call
the JPMorgan
Structured Investments group at 1-800-576-3529 or visit
www.jpmorgan.com/si.
Experience
the JPMorgan
Advantage
JPMorgan
Structured Investments are
designed to complement your clients’
overall investment strategy. New
solutions are under constant development
to provide you with
additional opportunities to enhance client portfolios. Experience the unique
benefits of JPMorgan Structured Investments, including:
|
·
|
Innovative
Structured Investments
that span all of the major asset
classes.
|
|
·
|
One
of the lower
investment minimums in
the industry.
|
|
·
|
Direct
access to Structured
Investment specialists who can guide you and your clients and manage
operational issues with your custodian or
broker-dealer.
|
|
·
|
A
commitment to education
demonstrated through teach-ins, conference
calls, and
educational materials.
|
Notes
The
information contained in this document is for discussion purposes only. The
final terms of any securities offered by JPMorgan Chase & Co. may be
different from the terms set forth herein and any such final terms will depend
on, among other things, market conditions on the applicable pricing date for
such securities. Any information relating to performance contained in these
materials is illustrative and no assurance is given that any indicated returns,
performance or results, whether historical or hypothetical, will be achieved.
These terms are subject to change, and JPMorgan undertakes no duty to update
this information. This document shall be amended, superseded and replaced in
its
entirety by a subsequent preliminary or final term sheet and/or pricing
supplement, and the documents referred to therein, which will be filed with
the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. In the event of any inconsistency
between the information presented herein and any such preliminary or final
term
sheet or pricing supplement, such preliminary or final term sheet or pricing
supplement shall govern.
SEC
Legend: JPMorgan Chase & Co. has filed a registration statement (including a
prospectus) with the SEC for any offerings to which these materials relate.
Before you invest, you should read the prospectus in that registration statement
and the other documents relating to this offering that JPMorgan Chase & Co.
has filed with the SEC for more complete information about JPMorgan Chase &
Co. and this offering. You may get these documents without cost by visiting
EDGAR on the SEC Web site at www.sec.gov. Alternatively, JPMorgan Chase &
Co., any agent or any dealer participating in this offering will arrange to
send
you the prospectus and each prospectus supplement as well as any product
supplement and term sheet if you so request by calling toll-free
866-535-9248.
IRS
Circular 230 Disclosure: JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates do not
provide tax advice. Accordingly, any discussion of U.S. tax matters contained
herein (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and
cannot be used, in connection with the promotion, marketing or recommendation
by
anyone unaffiliated with JPMorgan Chase & Co. of any of the matters address
herein or for the purpose of avoiding U.S. tax-related penalties.
Investment
suitability must be determined individually for each investor, and the financial
instruments described herein may not be suitable for all investors. The products
described herein should generally be held to maturity as early unwinds could
result in lower than anticipated returns. This information is not intended
to
provide and should not be relied upon as providing accounting, legal, regulatory
or tax advice. Investors should consult with their own advisors as to these
matters.
This
material is not
a product of JPMorgan Research Departments. Structured Investments may involve
a
high degree of risk, and may be appropriate investments only for sophisticated
investors who are capable of understanding and assuming the risks involved.
JPMorgan and its affiliates may have positions (long or short), effect
transactions or make markets in securities or financial instruments mentioned
herein (or options with respect thereto), or provide advice or loans to, or
participate in the underwriting or restructuring of the obligations of, issuers
mentioned herein. JPMorgan is the marketing name for JPMorgan Chase & Co.
and its subsidiaries and affiliates worldwide. J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
is a
member of NASD, NYSE and SIPC. Clients should contact their salespersons at,
and
execute transactions through, a JPMorgan entity qualified in their home
jurisdiction unless governing law permits otherwise.